Engineer proves that Kohler’s smart toilet cameras aren’t very private
Kohler is facing backlash after an engineer pointed out that the company’s new smart toilet cameras may not be as private as it wants people to believe. Th
e discussion raises questions about Kohler’s use of the term “end-to-end encryption” (E2EE) and the inherent privacy limitations of a device that films the goings-on of a toilet bowl. In Octob
er, Kohler announced its first “health” product, the Dekoda. Kohler’s ann
ouncement described the $599 device (it also requires a subscription that starts at $7 per month) as a toilet bowl attachment that uses “optical sensors and validated machine-learning algorithms” to deliver “valuable insights into your health and wellness.” The announcement added
: Data flows to the pers
onalized Kohler Health app, giving users continuous, private awareness of key health and wellness indicators—right on their phone. Features like fingerprin
t authentication and end-to-end encryption are designed for user privacy and security. The average person is mo
st likely to be familiar with E2EE through messaging apps, like Signal. Messages sent via apps w
ith E2EE are encrypted throughout transmission. Only the message’s sende
r and recipient can view the decrypted messages, which is intended to prevent third parties, including the app developer, from reading them. But how does E2EE apply to